Measured comparison of different brands and types of capacitors and inductors (D, Q, ESR, X)

I recently bought an LCR meter and wanted to measure the parameters of various capacitors and inductors on hand for comparison.

The test equipment is a Zhongchuang ET4410, and the measured parameters include: capacitance, inductance, D (dissipation factor), Q (quality factor), ESR (equivalent series resistance), and X (reactance, usually expressed as inductive reactance XL or capacitive reactance XC).

Full Excel table download link: https://url.zeruns.com/1W8cW

Zhongchuang ET4410 Benchtop LCR Digital Bridge Brief Unboxing & Review: https://blog.zeruns.com/archives/763.html

RIGOL DHO914S Oscilloscope Brief Unboxing & Review: https://blog.zeruns.com/archives/764.html

Electronics / Microcontroller Tech Group: 2169025065

Some of the tested capacitors are shown below:

Inductors

In the table below, “frequency” refers to the test frequency set on the bridge. Each component was measured at four frequency points—100 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, and 100 kHz—with a fixed test level of 1 V.

Generally, a higher Q is better, while lower ESR and X are preferable.

Inductor Type & Spec Freq (kHz) L (μH) Q ESR (mΩ) X (mΩ)
65125 Sendust Core, 22 µH, 1.2 mm wire 0.1 22.7 2.1 6.8 14.2
65125 Sendust Core, 22 µH, 1.2 mm wire 1 22.7 19.7 7.3 142.6
65125 Sendust Core, 22 µH, 1.2 mm wire 10 22.675 100.5 14 1424.7
65125 Sendust Core, 22 µH, 1.2 mm wire 100 22.605 67.1 211 14203
1770 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 0.1 21.9 0.66 20.9 13.8
1770 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 1 21.92 6.43 21.4 137.7
1770 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 10 21.817 39.7 34.5 1370.6
1770 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 100 21.506 63.5 213 13513
1265 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 0.1 22.8 0.46 30.2 14.3
1265 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 1 22.671 4.62 30.8 142.4
1265 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 10 22.66 35.8 39.8 1423.8
1265 Molded SMD Inductor, 22 µH 100 22.511 74 190 14145

Summary:

  • The sendust toroid doesn’t seem to perform well at high frequencies; Q drops at 100 kHz, peaking around 10 kHz (I also tried 20 kHz and it was even higher, so the peak is somewhere between 20 kHz and 100 kHz before declining).
  • Molded SMD inductors have better high-frequency behavior: Q keeps rising with frequency and surpasses the toroid at 100 kHz.
  • The toroid has lower ESR, probably due to its thicker wire, but its ESR becomes higher than the molded parts at elevated frequencies.

Capacitors

Again, each part was measured at 100 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, and 100 kHz with 1 V test level.

Lower D, ESR, and X are generally desired.

The Rubycon and ELNA caps were bought from a small Taobao shop and are likely counterfeit.

Cap Type & Spec Freq (kHz) C (µF) D ESR (Ω) X (Ω)
AISHI Polymer Solid, 220 µF, 50 V 0.1 210.4 0.0138 0.1042 -7.565
AISHI Polymer Solid, 220 µF, 50 V 1 207.22 0.0318 0.0245 -0.7681
AISHI Polymer Solid, 220 µF, 50 V 10 186.25 0.175 0.0151 -0.0855
AISHI Polymer Solid, 220 µF, 50 V 100 23.19 0.173 0.0125 -0.0685
ChengX General Al-Elec, 220 µF, 16 V 0.1 206.18 0.0662 0.513 -7.739
ChengX General Al-Elec, 220 µF, 16 V 1 193.02 0.2939 0.2428 -0.8246
ChengX General Al-Elec, 220 µF, 16 V 10 173.71 2.28 0.2094 -0.0917
ChengX General Al-Elec, 220 µF, 16 V 100 38.71 5.08 0.209 -0.0411
ChengX HF Al-Elec, 47 µF, 50 V 0.1 47.2 0.0264 0.889 -33.742
ChengX HF Al-Elec, 47 µF, 50 V 1 45.42 0.0811 0.2845 -3.5045
ChengX HF Al-Elec, 47 µF, 50 V 10 43.04 0.503 0.1858 -0.3698
ChengX HF Al-Elec, 47 µF, 50 V 100 20.57 2.295 0.1776 -0.0775
JWCO HF Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 0.1 199.77 0.0437 0.3148 -7.941
JWCO HF Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 1 194.49 0.2133 0.1747 -0.8183
JWCO HF Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 10 179.38 1.717 0.1528 -0.0888
JWCO HF Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 100 35.38 3.51 0.1577 -0.045
Rubycon Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 0.1 220.24 0.0332 0.24 -7.227
Rubycon Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 1 212.68 0.1018 0.076 -0.7484
Rubycon Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 10 197.57 0.77 0.0625 -0.0806
Rubycon Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 100 30.375 1.18 0.0617 -0.0527
ELNA Cerafine Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 0.1 199.33 0.0523 0.418 -7.986
ELNA Cerafine Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 1 191.92 0.262 0.217 -0.8294
ELNA Cerafine Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 10 172.87 2.08 0.192 -0.092
ELNA Cerafine Al-Elec, 220 µF, 63 V 100 28.528 3.39 0.19 -0.056
Unknown Monolithic, 47 nF 0.1 0.00004849 0.0134 445 -32829
Unknown Monolithic, 47 nF 1 0.00004801 0.0145 47.8 -3314.4
Unknown Monolithic, 47 nF 10 0.00004745 0.0155 5.23 -335.45
Unknown Monolithic, 47 nF 100 0.00004571 0.0151 0.519 -34.853
CEC SMD Tantalum, 10 µF, 16 V 0.1 10.153 0.0143 2.29 -156.72
CEC SMD Tantalum, 10 µF, 16 V 1 10.046 0.0763 1.208 -15.838
CEC SMD Tantalum, 10 µF, 16 V 10 9.466 0.653 1.1 -1.381
CEC SMD Tantalum, 10 µF, 16 V 100 4.56 2.3 0.811 -0.346

Summary:

  • Solid and electrolytic capacitors show obvious capacitance drop above 10 kHz.
  • Monolithic caps exhibit very high reactance and ESR at low frequencies.
  • Electrolytics see a large increase in D at higher frequencies, whereas solids hardly change; overall performance of solids is much better.
  • Performance varies noticeably among electrolytic brands; Rubycon tested best here.
  • Capacitive reactance decreases as frequency increases.

Conclusions may not be perfectly accurate—use as reference only.

Recommended Reading