This should be a power supply circuit board.
Notice the four pairs of opposing small tips in the red circles — could it be for discharging electricity?
This should be a power supply circuit board.
Notice the four pairs of opposing small tips in the red circles — could it be for discharging electricity?
Great question! Those four pairs of opposing small tips in the red circles are ESD (Electrostatic Discharge) protection spark gaps — a common passive protection design for power supply circuit boards.
ESD-related. The layout of the common-mode choke coil uses a serrated copper foil pattern. This way, when the voltage difference at both ends becomes too large, tip discharge into the air will occur.
This is a typical ESD discharge gap, an ultra-common passive protection design on power boards!
The core concept is to create a “fast discharge path” for static electricity: the opposing small tips inside the red circle form an extremely narrow air gap (typically just a fraction of a millimeter). When static accumulates to a certain voltage threshold, it directly arcs between these tips and discharges through the grounding path, preventing downstream sensitive components like ICs and capacitors from being damaged by breakdown.
This design offers low cost, high temperature resistance, and voltage tolerance advantages over ESD diodes, making it better suited for the harsh working environment of power boards. The four pairs of gaps are arranged to enhance protection redundancy, avoiding single-point failure risks.
The item circled in red is a passive ESD protection gap, specifically designed to address static electricity issues in power boards, offering clear advantages over active protection components:
Common misconception: Some may mistake it as “arc ignition” or “overvoltage fusing,” but this is entirely incorrect — the gap only targets transient high voltages from static electricity. Under normal operating voltages, the air gap remains insulating and does not affect circuit operation. The four-pair design further enhances protection stability.
Hmm… the AI’s response is this long?
How did you figure that out?
“Saw a pile of Markdown+Emoji and thought it was just a copied AI response…”
A bit like AI ![]()
AI text output format is all markdown
, Doubao is more normal, GPT adds emojis to every subheading